Ivannikov, V. ., Thomsen, F. ., Ebel, T. ., & Willumeit-Römer, R. . (2021). Capturing shrinkage and neck growth with phase field simulations of the solid state sintering. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, 29(7). http://doi.org/10.1088/1361-651X/ac1f87
Bertel, S. ., Beck, L. ., Clausen, B. ., & Räker, T. . (2021). Kompetenzen für eine digitale Welt. Wie viel Wissenschaft braucht die Lehrerfortbildung? Arbeitsbündnisse im analogen und virtuellen Raum. Universität Regensburg.
Pornak, S. C., Papachrysanthou, A. ., & Lehr, B. . (2021). Apps und webbasierte Interventionen in der Prostatakrebsnachsorge – ein Scoping Review. Der Urologe, 60, 911–920.
Petersen, K. ., & Bin Ali, N. . (2021). An analysis of top author citations in software engineering and a comparison with other fields. Scientometrics, 126, 9147–9183.
Küchler, R. ., & Herzig, C. . (2021). Connectivity is key: holistic sustainability assessment and reporting from the perspective of food manufacturers. British Food Journal. http://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-03-2021-0317
Abstract
As members of the food supply chain, food manufacturers acquire power and hold responsibility for the sustainable transformation of our food systems. Sustainability assessment and reporting frameworks function as instruments to shape sustainable transformation processes. Their suitability for food manufacturing companies and their connectivity with the up- and downstream food supply chain is investigated here.
The first section of the study explores the need for holistic, company-based sustainability frameworks in the food manufacturing sector from the literature. The second part compares seven frameworks, in terms of content and supply chain connectivity.
Food sector specificity demands the inclusion of topics specific to food systems. Furthermore, none of the investigated frameworks fulfils both food sector specificity and full connectivity with the up- and downstream supply chain.
As a limitation to this work, comparison of the frameworks at topic-level instead of indicator-level is considered. The findings call for more harmonised and integrated sustainability assessment throughout the food supply chain.
The framework a food manufacturer should apply depends on their motivation behind conducting the sustainability assessment and reporting. Evidence is provided from various perspectives and with regard to key issues such as content, certification and communication.
No comparison between sustainability frameworks has been made yet from the supply chain perspective of food manufacturers.
Irshad, M. ., Britto, R. ., & Petersen, K. . (2021). Adapting Behavior Driven Development (BDD) for large-scale software systems. Journal of Systems and Software, 177, 110944.
Boysen, C. ., Kaldemeyer, C. ., Sadat, F. ., Tuschy, I. ., Witte, F. ., Bauer, S. ., & Dahmke, A. . (2021). Integration unterirdischer Speichertechnologien in die Energiesystemtransformation am Beispiel des Modellgebietes Schleswig-Holstein - ANGUS II : Schlussbericht zum Verbundvorhaben Teilprojekt Simulation energietechnischer Einzelanlagen. Hochschule Flensburg. Abgerufen von https://www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/TIBKAT%3A1798315475
Kugler, M. ., Brandenburg, M. ., & Limant, S. . (2021). Automizing the manual link in maritime supply chains? An analysis of twistlock handling automation in container terminals. Maritime Transport Research, 2, 100017. http://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.martra.2021.100017
Abstract
The study at hand elaborates on potential barriers, prerequisites and optimization potentials for the automation of the twistlock handling process in container terminals. A case analysis enlightens latest automation developments of this essential task in container transport. Eight experts from different organizations in maritime logistics and seaport operations were interviewed in a qualitative multiple-case research design. The interviews were evaluated by qualitative-quantitative content analysis with MAXQDA software. Automated twistlock handling systems are hardly implemented, although they represent the missing link between other container handling technology in the automated container transport. The study reveals that most implementation barriers consist of technological issues, followed by economic and strategic barriers. The study identifies implementation strategies and their key success and shows that safety improvements and cost reductions are major benefits of this automation. An innovation framework for this field of automation is conceptualized as scientific contribution. Practical implications include recommendations for relevant stakeholders in container logistics.