<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xml><records><RECORD><source-app name="Bibcite" version="8.x">Drupal-Bibcite</source-app><REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE><CONTRIBUTORS><AUTHORS><AUTHOR><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Peter John</style></AUTHOR><AUTHOR><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Benjamin Brooks</style></AUTHOR><AUTHOR><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ulf Schriewer</style></AUTHOR></AUTHORS></CONTRIBUTORS><TITLES><TITLE><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Speech acts in professional maritime discourse: A pragmatic risk analysis of bridge team communication directives and commissives in full-mission simulation</style></TITLE></TITLES><KEYWORDS><KEYWORD><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Maritime team communication</style></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Professional discourse</style></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Corpus Pragmatics</style></KEYWORD><KEYWORD><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Speech act theory</style></KEYWORD></KEYWORDS><DATES/><AUTHORS><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%"/></AUTHORS><YEAR><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2019</style></YEAR><SECONDARY_TITLE><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of Pragmatics</style></SECONDARY_TITLE><PUBLISHER><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Elsevier</style></PUBLISHER><VOLUME><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">140</style></VOLUME><PAGES><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></PAGES><SECTION><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12</style></SECTION><DATE><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">01/2019</style></DATE><TYPE_OF_WORK><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Research paper</style></TYPE_OF_WORK><KEYWORD><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%"/></KEYWORD><ABSTRACT><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The paper studies verbal maritime communication by categorising spontaneous professional discourse observed in co-operative full-mission simulation exercises into the illocutionary points of commissives and directives according to Searle's original classification. The research adopts a Corpus Pragmatics approach by combining vertical Corpus Linguistics methods with horizontal Pragmatics analyses. Between-group analyses of speech acts by native and non-native speakers of English are carried out and possible risks of miscommunication classified and compared. On the basis of the circular Osgood-Schramm communication model the sender–receiver interaction is investigated for either speaker group. Findings include both quantitative and qualitative between-group differences in locutionary, illocutionary and perlocutionary speech acts. These differences are evaluated as causal factors in effective communicative acts and as contributory factors for miscommunication in the maritime domain.</style></ABSTRACT><URL><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037821661830033X</style></URL><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Speech acts in professional maritime discourse: A pragmatic risk analysis of bridge team communication directives and commissives in full-mission simulation</style></title></RECORD></records></xml>
